Letter: Oppression disguised as equality: A misnomer
As a concerned former citizen of Dubois County, I feel as though it is my obligation as a citizen of the earth to reach out to you with regards to a struggle. I write in response to the recent letter from a Jasper High School student regarding straight pride.
Though the student has great intentions in their writing of both the flyer and the response, much of what the student expresses reveals many of the underlying social injustices within the United States. I commend the student for trying to stand up for something they thought felt right. However, for the many voiceless LGBT youth in America, I want to be a light in the darkness. Though I’m very glad for this student’s heartfelt response, I want to point out a few things that are utterly flawed with the student’s initial intention and response.
Namely, privilege and oppression exist in society. LGBT folks, and especially youth, are members of an oppressed group of people in U.S. society.
Straight people should not mandate how LGBT folks should or should not protest or dictate the cause of their struggles. If black people listened to white people, we would still have Jim Crow laws, perhaps even slavery. It wasn’t just a few good white people determining they were wrong that brought down these laws, but rather, millions of black voices urging for change.
Women did not let the men in their lives dictate their protest; in fact, many women starved themselves for the right to vote.
In many of these struggles, members of groups have had amazing allies, and I do not want to bring those people down; however, it is important to point out that any group in the history of the United States that has won freedoms, be it constitutional or other, have done so by systematically approaching the problem and refusing to be silent.
Disagreeing with someone’s idea and disagreeing on the underlying forces of that idea are entirely different. You can state that you agree with equality and that members of the LGBT community deserve it, but if you sincerely “disagree” with them, then you need to know what you disagree about.
If you think that LGBT folks are sinful, disgusting, and your ideas or religion or philosophy dictate only two genders, and you believe that the laws of the land should dictate thoughts like that, you don’t believe in equality.
If you believe in equality, and I believe deep down the writer of this letter does, then you need to listen to the words of the members of this community because there are real world reasons they need to be heard. Perhaps when the word gay is not equated with sin, we might understand. Just how the word black used to be equated with property.
Many aspects of this issue were taken out of context, as is often the case, spouting for freedom of speech and opinion. Frankly, if you believe in freedom of speech, you agree with transgender and gay youth, as their identity is, well, their identity, and they are free to express it however they please. And this is quite often the case in these types of issues; however, this issue is quite different.
Being a member of the LGBT community is not “an idea” as the author of this whole argument contends. That’s why there is an uproar. The author can disagree with any idea an LGBT person may have and express that openly, but to equate being a member of the LGBT community with it simply being an “idea” is ludicrous. In fact, it’s this very notion of “choice” and being “ideas” that keep many LGBT youth in the closet and, as a result, leads to significantly higher suicide rates, close to 40 percent for transgender youth.
Ideas are not equated with aspects of identity. The idea a person’s religion might teach them is that gay people should be stoned to death; however, that idea states that gay people shouldn’t be allowed to live because it is somehow “sinful” or “disturbing.” It is, in fact, those ideas that marginalize LGBT youth. It seems rather absurd, considering being a member of the LGBT community is not so much a choice as an aspect of identity. I did not choose to be male, or straight, or white, or working class, but I am those things.
Someone disagreeing with a member of the LGBT community as being a “disagreement of ideas” is equal to treating a person who uses a wheelchair as faking their disability. In fact, that person may not have chosen their situation. Instead, just like many LGBT folks, people with disabilities want to be treated equally. However, if people with disabilities did not advocate for themselves (along with their many, many allies, of course), then the Americans With Disabilities Act would not have passed, mandating that businesses give equal opportunity, at least to the greatest extent feasible, to people with disabilities.
To some, this may be equated with “giving special privileges,” as is pointed out in the student’s letter. However, sometimes the giving up of privilege feels like oppression to the privileged. Despite this, the uplifting of women, LGBT folks, people with disabilities, people of color, poor people, and all other oppressed groups, is, in fact, the uplifting of us all.
Ethan Smith
Yosemite (formerly Ferdinand)

This is articulated in a very thoughtful and thorough way. The comparisons are solid. As a person who has studied the phenomenon of health disparities in oppressed populations, I am hopeful that readers will be open-minded to accepting these ideas as ones that can improve the general way in which we see our world and how we contribute to society.
Thank you, Ethan, so very much for this. You are spot on.
Ethan, Citizen of the earth? Really! Is anyone supposed to take you seriously?
Did you just pick the words you wanted to here? Every point is right on. That’s the only fact you let sink in? Really? Reading is feeling and educating. Thank you Ethan. Well said.
Hey Tom, you’re the only one who didn’t include your full name. Why?
As citizen of the earth, I find your letter to be exactly what I couldn’t put on paper! Outstanding. Thank you.
Dear Citizen of the earth. You make some very valid points. Homophobia is ugly and should not be tolerated by anyone. The writer of the flier and the follow up letter to the Herald wasn’t upset with the LBGTQ community, he was upset with the saturation of the message by the LBGTQ community. He has the right to turn the channel. Turn off the message. Speak out against the saturation of the message and write a flier or a letter to the local paper. He can stand behind his response or closet his message if he so chooses. He has garnered support for his response and those who have supported him have been called homophobic. Those who attacked his position in support of heterosexuality could also be called heterophobic.
The reality is all the debate has been good. The community is talking. Minds are being educated and sympathy for the various positions have been growing. The bad news is a lot of misinformation has also been occurring and that is not good.
Their is no definitive science that supports a genetic predisposition toward being gay.
“There is no consensus among scientists about the exact reasons that an individual develops a heterosexual, bisexual, gay or lesbian orientation. Although much research has examined the possible genetic, hormonal, developmental, social and cultural influences on sexual orientation, no findings have emerged that permit scientists to conclude that sexual orientation is determined by any particular factor or factors. Many think that nature and nurture both play complex roles; most people experience little or no sense of choice about their sexual orientation.” – American Psychological Society http://www.apa.org/topics/lgbt/orientation.aspx
DO GENES DETERMINE WHETHER WE ARE LESBIAN, GAY, BISEXUAL, OR STRAIGHT?
Position Paper by The Council for Responsible Genetics
http://www.councilforresponsiblegenetics.org/ViewPage.aspx?pageId=77
Most people who are homophobic or anti gay are because of long taught traditions or religious training. the reality is the bible does not condone homosexuality among Christians (1 Corinthians 6:9) but it is clear that those non-Christians who choose a gay lifestyle and not a member of the church are not to be judged by the church (1 Corinthians 5:12-13). Christian leaders should do a better job of teaching this passage of scripture.
If a communities leaders pass legislation discriminatory toward LBGQT people then the courts are a remedy for such change and have been changing those community laws since 2003. Of course we live in a democracy and nothing happens as fast as the offended party would like it to but change has come and still coming.
As far as our claim that homosexuality isn’t a choice, I would beg to differ. So many people have bounced in an out of the lifestyle it is hard to keep track. I had a brother who was gay then straight but unfortunate for him he was infected with HIV in the 80’s and died 10 years ago at the age of 48. The point is, one has a LEGAL right to choose to be gay or straight.
http://www.rebelcircus.com/blog/celebrities-went-straight-gay-back/
http://www.josephnicolosi.com/collection/celebrities-who-have-left-a-gay-lifestyle
http://latinosusa.today/1185/straight-celebrities-gay-not/
http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2013/january-february/my-train-wreck-conversion.html
http://www.deliveredbygrace.com/conversation-emily-thomes/
http://abcnews.go.com/Health/Sex/story?id=117465&page=1
Daryl Hensley – Jasper
I obviously read something very different in the student’s letter than did the others commenting on here. I believe that the student was making the point that the LGBT community (or the African-American community or women wanting the right to vote) should not argue “I’m gay,” or “I’m black”, or “I’m a woman” so I deserve equal rights as this just creates further separation and anger from those who are not gay, not black, and not women. The student was saying, I believe, that the argument should instead be “I am human therefore I deserve the same rights as you.” This brings about inclusiveness as we are all human and everyone should have the same rights. The student was saying we don’t always have to agree with the statements and ideas others present, but we should still love and another because we are all human.