Hicks: More deportation follies

Because of our strict legal immigration policies, poorer folks have little choice but to come here illegally.

Immigration is once again a policy topic, so it is good to apply a bit of arithmetic to proposed solutions. It is best to begin with legal immigration, where much of the later problems and costs accrue.

Legal immigrants to the United States are generally better educated, work at higher rates and earn more than native-born citizens. Given how hard it is to enter the U.S. legally, this should be unsurprising; only educated and relatively wealthy folks can afford to apply. This means poorer folks with similar lofty and, dare I say, traditionally American ambitions have little choice but to come here illegally.

Most estimates suggest a whopping 11 million illegal immigrants are in the U.S. That is fewer than four in every 100 people walking the streets, and here in Indiana that means a typical very large high school will have seven or eight illegal immigrant students in each grade.

This illegal immigration has both benefits and costs. The benefits should be obvious, as most of these folks want to work. They pay sales and property taxes, licensing fees on that work. Many, but by no means all, also pay payroll and income taxes. Like about half of native-born citizens, the typical illegal immigrant costs taxpayers more than they’ll pay in taxes over a lifetime. So what to do about that?

Like about half of native-born citizens, the typical illegal immigrant costs taxpayers more than they’ll pay in taxes over a lifetime. So what to do about that?

We could, of course, revise the immigration system and tax laws. We could craft a system that accommodates more temporary workers and collect more taxes on these folks. We could even charge a fine or fee for those who entered illegally, but who have afterwards been law-abiding citizens. This would enable us to more easily deport the folks who are actual criminals and allow us to support communities with high concentrations of immigrants. I don’t think that idea will be much talked about, though. It is too easy, sensible and cost effective. Instead we hear calls for mass deportation. Let me briefly analyze such a proposal.

A commercial bus ride from Chicago to Brownsville, Texas can be had for $198. So, if all of our illegal immigrants agreed to leave voluntarily, and Uncle Sam paid the bill, it’d be a bit over $2.1 billion. This is high fantasy though. By my calculations this trip will require about a third of the 840,000 registered busses in the U.S., most of which are those big yellow ones that drive through my neighborhood five days a week. So, we’ll have to plan this exodus in the summer, and it’ll cost more than $200 per deportee. The studies I have seen calculate the current cost of deportation from between $12,000 and $24,000 per person. That raises the costs of deportation to between $132 billion and $253 billion. This won’t catch the bad guys though, they are too slippery.

Of course, most of those who argue for full deportation know this is an impossible plan. So, when someone tells you they support deporting all our illegal immigrants, it isn’t that they are stupid enough to believe it. They just think you are.

Link to this commentary: http://commentaries.cberdata.org/800/more-deportation-follies

Hicks-Michael-jpg-1578Michael J. Hicks, PhD, is the director of the Center for Business and Economic Research and the George and Frances Ball distinguished professor of economics in the Miller College of Business at Ball State University. Hicks earned doctoral and master’s degrees in economics from the University of Tennessee and a bachelor’s degree in economics from Virginia Military Institute. He has authored two books and more than 60 scholarly works focusing on state and local public policy, including tax and expenditure policy and the impact of Wal-Mart on local economies.

Share

2 Comments

  1. I cant believe this was published.
    Sounds like a bunch of liberal bull to me. The actual estimates are upwards of 40 million illegals here. As far as you saying the only people who are legally allowed here are smarter than the average American shows that you have disdain for your own fellow citizens. The same thing people like Barbara Boxer, Obama and Anderson Cooper think of us; nice.
    The cost to deport illegals is way cheaper than the cost of supporting them and all of the anchor babies they produce. And don’t even go into the falsehoods that your kind normally spout as to how they are such a wonderful boon to our economy and they’re doing jobs that Americans won’t do, that has been debunked over and over.
    You do realize that when someone enters Mexico illegally that they are treated in a completely different way than illegals are here right? They do not stand for it. If these people don’t like the way their country is run or they economy there, they need to stand up and change it.
    America cannot be the saviour of the world’s poor. We gladly will help but make sure it’s done in a manageable way. We have to think of ourselves for once.

    1. I honor you, anonymous writer, your right to express your well-crafted views. But why deny this freedom to others? You write that another learned author (Michael J Hicks, PhD, in More Deportation Follies, August 24, 2015) should not be allowed to publish a view you oppose.

      The Dubois County Free Press should also be honored for publishing differing viewpoints. I assume most journalists in the media report the relevant news they receive. But will the mean-spirited, fact-tweaking, name-calling in today’s political media culture continue to work. I hope not.

      Ann Fierst
      Bloomington, Indiana
      August 27, 2015

Comments are closed.